CSR Basics

Overview: CSR Basics

CSR policy

Overview: CSR policy

CSR national The EU's CSR policy CSR: the global dimension
NAP

Overview: NAP

About the NAP

Overview: About the NAP

Objectives Development of the Action Plan Four action areas of the NAP Original version of the NAP Monitoring UN Guiding Principles NAP International
Commitment of the Federal Government

Overview: Commitment of the Federal Government

The state's duty to protect Activities of the Federal Government Cooperation with stakeholders
Corporate due diligence

Overview: Corporate due diligence

Federal Government expectations Five core elements of due diligence
Access to remedy and remediation
International forums and processes

Overview: International forums and processes

G7-Presidency 2022 Alliance 8.7
International frameworks
German Supply Chain Act (LkSG)

Overview: German Supply Chain Act (LkSG)

Background and development Implementation by enterprises FAQ
EU Supply Chain Law Initiative (CSDDD)

Overview: EU Supply Chain Law Initiative (CSDDD)

FAQ Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
EU Forced Labour Regulation Further EU Legislation

Overview: Further EU Legislation

EU Regulation Conflict Minerals EU Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR)
Sector dialogues

Overview: Sector dialogues

Sector Dialogue Food Retail and Food Industry

Overview: Sector Dialogue Food Retail and Food Industry

Members and Dialogue Agreement
Energy Sector Dialogue

Overview: Energy Sector Dialogue

Continuation of the Sector Dialogue Publication "Potential human rights risks along supply and value chains. Selected sections of the German energy industry" Minimising negative impacts of bauxite mining in Guinea Risk prevention in the construction and operation of energy infrastructure
Automotive Industry

Overview: Automotive Industry

Five Years of Sector Dialogue Automotive Industry Workstreams Guidelines
About the dialogues Cross-sector conferences and online seminars Setting up the dialogues
#FairSupplyChains dialogues Benefits for companies Information, advice, training and networks

Overview: Information, advice, training and networks

Information and advice Networks and training Guidance documents

Overview: Guidance documents

General guidelines Sector-specific guides
News Contact
Basics

Overview: Basics

CSR Basics

Overview: CSR Basics

CSR policy
NAP

Overview: NAP

About the NAP
Commitment of the Federal Government
Corporate due diligence
Access to remedy and remediation
International forums and processes

Overview: International forums and processes

G7-Presidency 2022
Alliance 8.7
International frameworks
Legislation

Overview: Legislation

German Supply Chain Act (LkSG)

Overview: German Supply Chain Act (LkSG)

Background and development
Implementation by enterprises
FAQ
EU Supply Chain Law Initiative (CSDDD)

Overview: EU Supply Chain Law Initiative (CSDDD)

FAQ Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
EU Forced Labour Regulation
Further EU Legislation

Overview: Further EU Legislation

EU Regulation Conflict Minerals
EU Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR)
Implementation

Overview: Implementation

Sector dialogues

Overview: Sector dialogues

Sector Dialogue Food Retail and Food Industry
Energy Sector Dialogue
Automotive Industry
About the dialogues
Cross-sector conferences and online seminars
Setting up the dialogues
#FairSupplyChains dialogues
Benefits for companies
Information, advice, training and networks

Overview: Information, advice, training and networks

Information and advice
Networks and training
Guidance documents
Service

Overview: Service

News
Contact
Home Basics NAP Corporate due diligence Federal Government expectations

Federal Government expectations

Enterprises as reliable partners in upholding human rights

The Federal government expects all enterprises – including those not subject to the binding rules under the Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichengesetz – LkSG) – to introduce guidelines and processes to fulfil their human rights due diligence obligations - in Germany and in their operations abroad. This expectation was formulated in the National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights (NAP) in 2016.

When designing and implementing their due diligence processes in the area of human rights, consideration should be given to the beneficial effects of corporate activity and the different perspectives of the company’s employees, relevant stakeholders and others who may be affected. In large enterprises, these include the human resources, purchasing, compliance and sales departments. From outside the enterprise, suppliers, customers and trade unions as well as bodies from civil society, business organisations and governments should be involved. Particular attention should be directed to the rights of their respective employees and to those of local populations who may be affected.

Enterprises should strive to inspect the work of their suppliers and their subcontractors in order to achieve the best possible transparency with respect to production, working and environmental conditions, to identify risks and to develop solutions.

In places where governments fail to adequately enforce legal principles – due to a lack of laws or controls, for example – enterprises operating there have a heightened responsibility to ensure that human rights are respected in their sphere of activity. Here, too, they should take measures to prevent potential human rights violations and redress the human rights violations that they caused.

It should be possible for any given enterprise to incorporate its human rights due diligence obligations into its existing processes in an appropriate manner without creating undue bureaucratic burdens. The scope of the measures to be taken should depend on the size of the enterprise, the nature of its products or services, the potential risk of particularly adverse impacts on human rights and the enterprise's operating context. This is an obligation of conduct, not an obligation of result or assumption of guarantee.

When implementing the National Action Plan for Business and Human Rights, the Federal Government set up additional advisory and support services. Enterprises, the Federal Government, civil society and unions work together in multi-stakeholder initiatives in various sectors. They offer an added value especially when enterprises are confronted with challenges that are too big or complex to tackle them on their own. Joint initiatives with other enterprises may increase the scope and efficiency of activities, pool resources and work together to reach objectives. They serve as platforms for an exchange of experience, provide orientation and prepare potential solutions to effectively improve environmental and social standards. As provided for in the NAP, this has helped enterprises to implement human rights due diligence in a sector-specific way and commensurate with their size and position in the supply chain. The Federal Government has long supported this.